Irreführende Geisterdebatte oder funktionale Notwendigkeit?

Regimetheoretische Überlegungen zur Re- Regulierungsdiskussion am Beispiel der Weltumweltordnung

Authors

  • Cord Jakobeit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v30i118.786

Keywords:

Regimetheorie, Regulierung, Umweltpolitik, Global Governance, Krise

Abstract

The paper starts with a presentation and critique of regime theoretical approaches to the understanding of world economic developments after 1945. Within the debate on re-regulation, the normative-idealistic calls for a global environmental organisation seem to ignore what we have learned so far about the change and the effectiveness of international regimes. A fundamental regime change requires the consensus of the hegemon and/or the hegemonial group. And regime effectiveness does not primarily depend upon hierarchical organisational structures. Rather than advocating a global environmental organisation, from an ecological perspective the reform-minded transnational discourse networks would be better adviced to work for the acceptance of ecologically oriented indicators for economic development within all existing organisations of the world economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2000-03-01

How to Cite

Jakobeit, C. (2000). Irreführende Geisterdebatte oder funktionale Notwendigkeit? Regimetheoretische Überlegungen zur Re- Regulierungsdiskussion am Beispiel der Weltumweltordnung. PROKLA. Journal of Critical Social Science, 30(118), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v30i118.786

Issue

Section

Articles of the Special Issue

Similar Articles

<< < 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.