Economics of Scarcity

A Mode of Production in Search for Allocative Efficiency

Authors

  • Max Grünberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v54i215.2115

Keywords:

Allocation Problem, Coordination, Economic Planning, Relative Scarcity

Abstract

Against the hope to overcome scarcity, I argue to center any speculation about the functioning of a postcapitalist economy on approaches of how society might administer scarcity. Beginning the analysis from Lionel Robbins’ concept of relative scarcity, four fundamental allocative mechanisms are presented as an alternative to the market mechanism. Yet, in light of their evident inadequacy to efficiently coordinate the material flows of the world economy, I conclude that others might also have to get to terms with a socialist interpretation of markets, which restricts planning ambitions to the commanding heights of the economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albert, Michael / Robin, Hahnel (1991): The Political Economy of Participatory Economics. New Jersey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691216003.

Balla, Bálint (1978): Soziologie der Knappheit: Zum Verständnis individueller und gesellschaftlicher Mängelzustände. Stuttgart.

Bastani Aaron (2019): Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto. London.

Cockshott, Paul / Cottrell, Allin (1993): Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham.

Cole, George (1935): Principles of Economic Planning. London.

Christopher, Brett (2023): The Price is Wrong: Why Capitalism Won’t Save the Planet. London.

Deutsche Wohnen & Co. enteignen (2023): Gemeingut Wohnen. Eine Anstalt öffentlichen Rechts fu?r Berlins vergesellschaftete Wohnungsbestände. URL: https://content.dwenteignen.de/uploads/Gemeingut_Wohnen_3a03fa4c87.pdf, Zugriff 11.2.2024.

Dobb, Maurice (1967): Some Further Comments on the Discussion about Socialist Price-policy. In: Papers on Capitalism, Development, and Planning. London.

Grünberg, Max (2023a): The Planning Daemon: Future Desire and Communal Production. In: Historical Materialism 31(4): 115-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-bja10001.

– (2023b): Automating away the centre? Optimal planning and the menace of bureaucratisation. Early Access. In: Competition & Change 0(0). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231218868.

Harvey, David (1974): Population, Resources, and the Ideology of Science. In: Economic Geography 50(3): 256-277.

Hayek, Friedrich A. (1948): The Use of Knowledge in Society. In: Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago.

– (2007): The Road to Serfdom. Chicago.

Heller, Ágnes (1980): Theorie der Bedürfnisse bei Marx. Hamburg.

Jevons, William S. (1865): The Coal Question. London/Cambridge.

Kornai, János (1980): Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam.

Laibman, David (2022): Systemic Socialism: A Model of the Models. In: Science & Society 86(2): 225-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2022.86.2.225.

Malthus, Thomas (1798): An Essay on the Principle of Population. London.

Meretz, Stefan / Sutterlütti, Simon (2018): Kapitalismus aufheben: Eine Einladung, über Utopie und Transformation neu nachzudenken. Hamburg.

– (2023): Verteilte commonistische Planung. URL: https://keimform.de/2023/anarchistische-gesellschaftsentwuerfe, Zugriff: 11.2.2024.

MEW – Marx, Karl / Engels, Friedrich: Marx-Engels-Werke. Berlin 1956ff.

Mises, Ludwig von (1932): Die Gemeinwirtschaft. Untersuchungen über den Sozialismus. Jena. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110504705.

Mouffe, Chantal (2000): The Democratic Paradox. London.

Paech, Nico (2012): Liberation from Excess: The Road to a Post-Growth Economy. München. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/9783865815279.

Ritchie, Hannah (2023): China uses as much cement in two years as the US did over the entire 20th century. URL: https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/china-us-cement, Zugriff 17.4.2024.

Robbins, Lionel (1937): Economic Planning and International Order. London.

– (1945): An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London.

Roemer, John (1994): A Future for Socialism. Cambridge.

Sahlins, Marshall (2017): Stone Age Economics. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315184951.

Saito, Kohei (2017): Karl Marx’s Ecosocialism: Capital, Nature, and the Unfinished Critique of Political Economy. New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gk099m.

Vogl, Joseph (2020): Oikodizee. In: Vogl, Joseph / Wolf, Burckhardt (Hg.) Handbuch Literatur & Ökonomie. Berlin/Boston: 224-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110516821-043.

Welz, Gisela (2015): Knappheit – eine anthropologische Kategorie? In: Tauschek, Markus / Grewe, Maria (Hg.): Knappheit, Mangel, Überfluss. Kulturwissenschaftliche Positionen zum Umgang mit begrenzten Ressourcen. Frankfurt/New York: 35-56.

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Grünberg, M. (2024). Economics of Scarcity: A Mode of Production in Search for Allocative Efficiency. PROKLA. Journal of Critical Social Science, 54(215), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v54i215.2115

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.