Ökobilanz und kybernetische Wirtschaftsplanung: Demokratisch geplante Wirtschaft zur Befriedigung gesellschaftlicher Bedürfnisse in planetaren Grenzen

Jakob Heyer; Walther Zeug

doi:10.32387/prokla.v54i215.2116

Autor/innen

Jakob Heyer https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4104-3052
Walther Zeug Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-6984

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v54i215.2116

Schlagworte:

Demokratie, Kybernetik, Nachhaltigkeit, Planwirtschaft

Abstract

Viele bisherige Ansätze einer demokratischen Wirtschaftsplanung bleiben hinter den wissenschaftlichen und technischen Möglichkeiten zurück. Daher werden in diesem Konzept einer demokratischen, zentral-dezentral geplanten Wirtschaft kybernetische Ansätze und Methoden aus der Nachhaltigkeits- und Umweltsystemforschung integriert. Das Ziel dieser Kombination aus zentralen Planungselementen sowie dezentralen Regelungs- und Vernetzungstechniken relativ autonom agierender Unternehmen ist, die gesellschaftlichen Bedürfnisse innerhalb planetarer Grenzen zu befriedigen.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Literaturhinweise

Adler, Paul S. (2019): The 99 percent economy: how democratic socialism can overcome the crises of capitalism. New York.

Albert, Michael / Hahnel, Robin (1991): The Political Economy of Participatory Economics. Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691216003.

Allen, Robert C. (2003): Farm to Factory: A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution. Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400832552.

Bauriedl, Sybille (2016): Politische Ökologie: nicht-deterministische, globale und materielle Dimensionen von Natur/Gesellschaft-Verhältnissen. In: Geographica Helvetica 71(4): 341-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-341-2016.

Beer, Stafford (1994): Designing freedom. Chichester u.a.

Brand, Ulrich (2015): Sozial-ökologische Tranformation. In: Bauriedl, Sybille (Hg.): Wörterbuch Klimadebatte. Bielefeld: 277-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839432389-036.

Bringezu, Stefan (2022): Das Weltbudget: Sichere und faire Ressourcennutzung als globale Überlebensstrategie. Wiesbaden. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37774-8.

Budzinski, Maik u.a. (2017): Monitoring the progress towards bioeconomy using multi-regional input-output analysis: The example of wood use in Germany. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 161: 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.090.

Cockshott, W. Paul u.a. (2022): Economic Planning in an Age of Climate Crisis. Wroclaw.

Cockshott, W. Paul / Cottrell, Allin (1993): Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham.

Dapprich, Jan Philipp (2022a): Optimal Planning with Consumer Feedback: A Simulation of a Socialist Economy. In: Review of Political Economy 35(4): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2021.2005367.

– (2022b): Tokens make the world go round: socialist tokens as an alternative to money. In: Review of Evolutionary Political Economy 4: 497-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-022-00091-6.

Devine, Pat (1988): Democracy And Economic Planning: The Political Economy Of A Self-Governing Society. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429033117.

– (2017): Ecosocialism for a New Era. In: Westra, Richard. u.a. (Hg.): Varieties of Alternative Economic Systems. Practical Utopias for an Age of Global Crisis and Austerity. London: 33-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315397344-4.

Durand, Cédric u.a. (2023): Planning Beyond Growth. The Case for Economic Democracy within Economic Limits. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4457481.

Ellman, Michael (2014): Socialist Planning. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871341.

Foley, Duncan K. (2020): Socialist alternatives to capitalism II: Vienna to Santa Fe. In: Review of Evolutionary Political Economy 1: 313-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00013-4.

Fröhlich, Nils (2009): Die Aktualität der Arbeitswerttheorie – Theoretische und empirische Aspekte. Marburg.

Görg, Christoph (2003): Dialektische Konstellationen. Zu einer kritischen Theorie gesellschaftlicher Naturverhältnisse. In: Demirovic, Alex (Hg.): Modelle kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie. Stuttgart: 39-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-02788-7_3.

– (2015): Planetarische Grenzen. In: Bauriedl, Sybille (Hg.): Wörterbuch Klimadebatte. Bielefeld: 239-243.

– u.a. (2017): Challenges for Social-Ecological Transformations: Contributions from Social and Political Ecology. In: Sustainability 9(7): 1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071045.

Hahnel, Robin (2021): Democratic Economic Planning. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173700.

Herrmann, Ulrike (2022): Das Ende des Kapitalismus. Warum Wachstum und Klimaschutz nicht vereinbar sind-und wie wir in Zukunft leben werden. Köln.

Heyer, Jakob (2024): Basic Problems of a Democratically Planned Economy. Bristol (im Erscheinen).

Jander, Wiebke / Grundmann, Philipp (2019): Monitoring the transition towards a bioeconomy: A general framework and a specific indicator. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 236: 117564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.039.

Kornai, János (1992): The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691228020.

Laibman, David (1992): Market and Plan: The Evolution of Socialist Social Structures in History and Theory. In: Science and Society 56(1): 60-91.

– (2001): Contours of the Maturing Socialist Economy. In: Historical Materialism 9(1): 85-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156920601760039195.

– (2013): Mature Socialism: Design, Prerequisites, Transitions. In: Review of Radical Political Economics 45(4): 501-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613412475190.

Marcolli, Matilde (2020): The Problem of Scale in Anarchism and the Case for Cybernetic Communism.

MEW – Marx, Karl / Engels, Friedrich: Marx-Engels-Werke. Berlin 1956ff.

Mesa Estrada, Laura Sofia u.a. (2022): MCDA for sustainability assessment – insights to Helmholtz Association activities – Working Paper. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7273635.

Moreno-Casas, Vicente u.a. (2022): The political economy of complexity: The case of cyber-communism. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 204: 566-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.10.042.

Neurath, Otto (1919): Durch die Kriegswirtschaft zur Naturalwirtschaft. München.

O’Neill, Daniel. W. u.a. (2018): A good life for all within planetary boundaries. In: Nature Sustainability 1(2): 88-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.

O’Neill, John (2002): Socialist Calculation and Environmental Valuation: Money, Markets and Ecology. In: Science & Society 66(1): 137-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.66.1.137.21006.

Oberle, Bruno u.a. (2019): Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future We Want (A Report of the International Resource Panel).

Phillips, Leigh / Rozworski, Michal (2019): The People’s Republic of Walmart: How the World’s Biggest Corporations are Laying the Foundation for Socialism. London/New York.

Pitt, Jeremy (2022): Self-Organising Multi-Agent Systems. Algorithmic Foundations of Cyber-Anarcho-Socialism. London/Hackensack. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/q0307.

Planning for Entropy (2022): Democratic Economic Planning, Social Metabolism and the Environment. In: Science & Society 86(2): 291-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2022.86.2.291.

Platenkamp, Tim (2024): The Constitution of Socialism. London/New York (im Erscheinen).

Rockström, Johan u.a. (2009): A safe operating space for humanity. In: Nature 461: 472-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.

– u.a. (2023): Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. In: Science Advances 9(37): eadh2458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458.

Roemer, John E. (1994): A Future for Socialism. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Sait?, K?hei (2022): Marx in the Anthropocene: Towards the Idea of Degrowth Communism. Cambridge/New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108933544.

Saros, Daniel E. (2014): Information Technology and Socialist Construction: The End of Capital and the Transition to Socialism. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814001.

Schweickart, David (1996): Against capitalism. Boulder.

Silk, Ezra (2016): Victory Plan: The Climate Mobilization.

Sorg, Christoph (2022): Failing to Plan Is Planning to Fail: Toward an Expanded Notion of Democratically Planned Postcapitalism. In: Critical Sociology 49(3): 089692052210810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221081058.

Steffen, Will u.a. (2018): Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. In: PNAS 115(33): 8252-8259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115.

Teh, Soo Huey u.a. (2017): Replacement Scenarios for Construction Materials Based on Economy-wide Hybrid LCA. In: Procedia Engineering 180: 179-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.177.

UBA (Umweltbundesamt) (2013): Treibhausgasneutrales Deutschland im Jahr 2050. Dessau-Roßlau.

Vettese, Troy / Pendergrass, Drew (2022): Half-earth socialism: a plan to save the future from extinction, climate change, and pandemics. London/New York.

Wright, Ian (2005): The social architecture of capitalism. In: Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 346(3-4): 589-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.08.006.

Zeug, Walther u.a. (2021): A framework for implementing holistic and integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of regional bioeconomy. In: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 26(10): 1998-2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01983-1.

– (2022): Application of holistic and integrated LCSA: Case study on laminated veneer lumber production in Central Germany. In: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 27(12): 1352-1375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02098-x.

– (2023a): Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for Sustainable Bioeconomy, Societal-Ecological Transformation and Beyond. In: Hesser, Franziska u.a. (Hg.): Progress in Life Cycle Assessment 2021. Cham: 131-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29294-1_8.

– (2023b): Holistic and integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of prospective biomass to liquid production in Germany. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 418: 138046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138046.

Zeug, Walter / Mast, Lisa Marie (2024): Der ideologische Fußabdruck des Kapitalismus. In: Phase 2 61. URL: https://www.phase-zwei.org/hefte/artikel/der-ideologische-fussabdruck-des-kapitalismus-2322, Zugriff: 2.4.2024.